qualitative behaviour
- North America > United States > Virginia (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom (0.04)
- Europe > Hungary > Budapest > Budapest (0.04)
- Europe > Belgium > Flanders (0.04)
- North America > United States > Virginia (0.04)
- North America > United States > New York (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom (0.04)
- (2 more...)
The practice of qualitative parameterisation in the development of Bayesian networks
Mascaro, Steven, Woodberry, Owen, Wu, Yue, Nicholson, Ann E.
The typical phases of Bayesian network (BN) structured development include specification of purpose and scope, structure development, parameterisation and validation. Structure development is typically focused on qualitative issues and parameterisation quantitative issues, however there are qualitative and quantitative issues that arise in both phases. A common step that occurs after the initial structure has been developed is to perform a rough parameterisation that only captures and illustrates the intended qualitative behaviour of the model. This is done prior to a more rigorous parameterisation, ensuring that the structure is fit for purpose, as well as supporting later development and validation. In our collective experience and in discussions with other modellers, this step is an important part of the development process, but is under-reported in the literature. Since the practice focuses on qualitative issues, despite being quantitative in nature, we call this step qualitative parameterisation and provide an outline of its role in the BN development process.
- Oceania > Australia > Victoria > Melbourne (0.05)
- Oceania > Australia > New South Wales > Sydney (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Suffolk County > Boston (0.04)
- (3 more...)
Adaptation through prediction: multisensory active inference torque control
Meo, Cristian, Franzese, Giovanni, Pezzato, Corrado, Spahn, Max, Lanillos, Pablo
Adaptation to external and internal changes is major for robotic systems in uncertain environments. Here we present a novel multisensory active inference torque controller for industrial arms that shows how prediction can be used to resolve adaptation. Our controller, inspired by the predictive brain hypothesis, improves the capabilities of current active inference approaches by incorporating learning and multimodal integration of low and high-dimensional sensor inputs (e.g., raw images) while simplifying the architecture. We performed a systematic evaluation of our model on a 7DoF Franka Emika Panda robot arm by comparing its behavior with previous active inference baselines and classic controllers, analyzing both qualitatively and quantitatively adaptation capabilities and control accuracy. Results showed improved control accuracy in goal-directed reaching with high noise rejection due to multimodal filtering, and adaptability to dynamical inertial changes, elasticity constraints and human disturbances without the need to relearn the model nor parameter retuning.
- Europe > Netherlands > South Holland > Delft (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Europe > Netherlands > Gelderland > Nijmegen (0.04)